Nissan Pathfinder 2001 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 359 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 115 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 177 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.1 | 10.2 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 735 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 11 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1076 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2407 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pathfinder has 701 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1737 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |