Nissan Pathfinder 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 55 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 13.1 | |
| Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pathfinder is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1076 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2407 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 28 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`404 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |