Nissan Pathfinder 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 266 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder and Jeep Grand Cherokee have the same engine power, but Nissan Pathfinder torque is 107 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |