Nissan Pathfinder 2000 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 266 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 55 HP less power than Isuzu Rodeo, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 12.5 | |
| Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 13 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2297 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |