Nissan Pathfinder 1990 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Grand Vitara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Suzuki Grand Vitara is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 153 HP | 87 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 144 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 - 11.0 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 890 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pathfinder has 632 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`863 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |