Nissan Pathfinder 1990 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Isuzu Rodeo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Isuzu Rodeo can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Isuzu Rodeo also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 | 2.6 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 153 HP | 120 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 204 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.0 - 13.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 12 cm shorter than the Isuzu Rodeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 890 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`148 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |