Nissan Pathfinder 1990 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Pathfinder is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Blazer has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Nissan Pathfinder is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Blazer can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Blazer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 153 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 244 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.6 | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller, but higher. Nissan Pathfinder is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 890 litres | 1056 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2098 litres | |
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Nissan Pathfinder has 166 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`423 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |