Nissan Pathfinder 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan X-Trail is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 284 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 352 NM | 240 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Nissan X-Trail are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Pathfinder. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 10.7 | 4.9 - 6.2 | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 178 mm (7 inches) | 204 - 210 mm (8 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 35 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 14 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2251 litres | 1982 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`717 kg | ~ 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`979 kg | ~ 1`671 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 738 kg | ~ 619 kg | |
| Nissan Pathfinder load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan Pathfinder is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |