Nissan Pathfinder 2016 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Defender can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Pathfinder also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 284 HP | 200 - 635 HP | |
| Torque: | 352 NM | 350 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 10.7 | 2.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 178 mm (7 inches) | 291 - 323 mm (11.5 - 12.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.97 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 2059 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2251 litres | 2277 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 26 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 1.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`717 kg | ~ 3`242 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`979 kg | ~ 2`392 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 738 kg | ~ 850 kg | |
| Nissan Pathfinder load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Land Rover Defender. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 57 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |