Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Honda CR-V is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 550 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 9.5 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, Nissan Pathfinder equipped with diesel engines consume 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 25 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 422 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`913 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |