Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 550 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 9.5 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 28 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 10 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pathfinder has 140 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1421 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 1.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`913 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |