Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Pathfinder is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 - 260 HP | 150 - 173 HP | |
Torque: | 325 - 368 NM | 233 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.7 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 10.5 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 37 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 17 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 603 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | 1773 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 150 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 487 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`146 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |