Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Pathfinder is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Outlander has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 - 260 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
Torque: | 325 - 368 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.7 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 10.5 | 1.9 - 8.9 | |
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 16 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 771 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | 1792 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 318 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 468 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`159 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |