Nissan Note 2005 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Note and Toyota Corolla have the same engine power, but Nissan Note torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Note 2005 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Note is smaller, but higher. Nissan Note is 10 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |