Nissan Note 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 3 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Nissan Cube | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Note is 21 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 854 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`546 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |