Nissan Note 2009 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Note engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Note 2009 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Note is 20 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 148 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.9 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |