Nissan Note 2009 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 5 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Despite less power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Trax | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Note 2009 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Nissan Note is 6 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 653 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.06 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.94 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`592 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |