Nissan Note 2009 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 5 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.2 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Trax | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Note 2009 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Nissan Note is 6 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 653 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.9 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`613 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |