Nissan Note 2009 vs Hyundai ix20 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Note engine produces 16 HP more power than Hyundai ix20, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Hyundai ix20. Thanks to more power Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.3 | |
|
The Hyundai ix20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai ix20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai ix20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Note 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.60 m | |
| Nissan Note and Hyundai ix20 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1486 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix20 has more luggage space. Nissan Note has 160 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix20. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix20 (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix20, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`641 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Hyundai ix20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix20, so Hyundai ix20 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Hyundai ix20 has
| |