Nissan Note 2009 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 3 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Note consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Nissan Cube | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Note is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`546 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |