Nissan Note 2009 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 11 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 1 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Jazz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Nissan Cube | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Note is 20 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 148 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.9 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`546 | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |