Nissan Note 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2015

 
Nissan Note
2013 - 2017
Suzuki Swift
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP136 HP
Torque: 200 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 secondsn/a seconds
Nissan Note engine produces 46 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 40 NM more than Suzuki Swift.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.66.5
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Note consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 41 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m3.89 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.53 m1.51 m
Nissan Note is 21 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres210 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data900 litres
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Note has 115 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5101`520
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 5600no data
Pros and Cons: Nissan Note has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Suzuki Swift has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv