Nissan Note 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 14 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.51 m | |
| Nissan Note is 25 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 528 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 114 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 967 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |