Nissan Note 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Note is smaller. Nissan Note is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Nissan Note has 29 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Note, so Nissan Juke quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |