Nissan Note 2013 vs Toyota Auris 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Auris 2009 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Auris 2009 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Note is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Note is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 750 litres | |
| Nissan Note has 25 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 745 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Auris has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |