Nissan Note 2013 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Note consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.45 m | |
| Nissan Note is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 25 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Renault Clio has
| |