Nissan Note 2013 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 5 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Note is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 105 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 463 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |