Nissan Note 2013 vs Honda Jazz 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 22 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 40 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Note is 7 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 1314 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 29 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 181 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |