Nissan Note 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 79 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 106 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
Nissan Note engine produces 11 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.8 | |
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Note could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`385 | 1`535 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |