Nissan Note 2017 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 79 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.9 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`315 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |