Nissan Note 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.8 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |