Nissan Note 2017 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 43 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 147 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`585 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |