Nissan Note 2017 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford Fusion, but torque is 7 NM less than Ford Fusion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 6.5 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Used also on Ford Fiesta | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1175 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fusion has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |