Nissan Note 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 45 NM less than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.6 | 4.8 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Note consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |