Nissan Note 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 15 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 15 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 528 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
| |