Nissan Note 2017 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 103 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Nissan Note engine produces 29 HP more power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 7 NM less than Nissan Micra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 41 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 265 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`425 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | low | |
Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
| |