Nissan Note 2017 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 18 HP more power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Ford Fusion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Used also on Ford Fiesta | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1175 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`385 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fusion has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |