Nissan Note 2017 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 41 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Honda Jazz. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Note 2017 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
| |