Nissan Note 2012 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Note engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Note consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Note consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Note is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1495 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 105 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 463 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`510 kg | 1`450 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`187 kg | 965 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 323 kg | 485 kg | |
| Nissan Note load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Colt. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |