Nissan Note 2012 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Note engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Note consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Note consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Note is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 105 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 463 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |