Nissan Note 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017

 
Nissan Note
2012 - 2017
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP95 HP
Torque: 200 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds11.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Note engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.63.7
Nissan Note consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.05 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.53 m1.45 m
Nissan Note is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1495 litres1125 litres
Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 26 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 370 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5101`720
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Note, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 56009800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Note has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv