Nissan Note 2012 vs Renault Clio 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.19 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.71 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Note 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2012 1.5 engine Renault Clio 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Clio 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.45 m | |
| Nissan Note is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1495 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 25 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`510 kg | 1`706 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`185 kg | 1`204 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 325 kg | 502 kg | |
| Nissan Note load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Renault Clio has
| |