Nissan Note 2012 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 9 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 73 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Note 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Note is 20 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 883 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 12 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 612 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |