Nissan Note 2010 vs Subaru Impreza 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Note) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Impreza) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Note engine produces 15 HP less power than Subaru Impreza, but torque is 58 NM more than Subaru Impreza. Despite less power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Note 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Note is smaller, but higher. Nissan Note is 36 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Note is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Impreza has more luggage space. Nissan Note has 76 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |