Nissan Note 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Note engine produces 9 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 73 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Note reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Note consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Nissan Note over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Note consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Note 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Note is 20 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Note is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 148 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.9 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |