Nissan Note 2017 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Note is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 79 - 140 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 163 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.6 - 5.4 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Note petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`438 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |