Nissan Note 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 79 - 140 HP | 94 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 163 NM | 118 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.6 - 5.4 | 5.0 - 6.5 | |
|
Nissan Note petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`438 | ~ 1`507 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
| |