Nissan Note 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 79 - 140 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 163 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.6 - 5.4 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Nissan Note petrol engines consumes on average 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.70 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`438 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |