Nissan Note 2005 vs Nissan Micra 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 65 - 88 HP | |
Torque: | 128 - 200 NM | 110 - 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.0 | 4.5 - 6.8 | |
Nissan Note petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Nissan Note equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
Nissan Note is larger. Nissan Note is 36 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Note is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 371 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 584 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 91 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 748 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`576 | ~ 1`485 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Micra has
| |