Nissan Note 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 200 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | 9.9 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.0 | 4.6 - 6.2 | |
|
Nissan Note petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Nissan Note equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Note is 21 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 854 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage capacity. Nissan Note has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`576 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |